![]() ![]() Rust's standard docs are little more than Javadocs with extremely minimal examples. Python in particular does a really nice job of breaking down what a class is designed to do and how to do it. When I have a question about a language feature in C# or Python, I go look at the official language documentation. I'm not attempting to make a value comparison of the languages themselves, but simply comparing workflows I like with workflows I find frustrating or counterintuitive. Hopefully someone else has faced some of the same issues and can explain why the language is still worthwhile.įwiw - I'm going to make a lot of comparisons to the languages I'm comfortable with. Perhaps my perspective as a beginner will be helpful to someone. I'll keep the frustration to myself, but I do have a number of critiques I wouldn't mind discussing. I haven't spent this much time fighting a language in awhile. I've been at this for about a month and so far I'm not understanding the love at all. When it recently came time to rewrite one of my projects as a small webservice, it seemed like the perfect time to learn Rust. I noticed Rust topping the StackOverflow most loved language list earlier this year, and I've been hearing good things about Rust's memory model and "free" concurrency for awhile. I've been a Java/C#/Python dev for a number of years. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |